aijobimpactcalculator.com
Menu

Reference / Glossary / Last verified April 2026

AI job impact glossary

Every term used by the calculator and the per-occupation pages, defined in one sentence with a notable distinction or example. Anchors are deep-linkable. Schema-marked as DefinedTermSet for AI engine citation.

AI augmentation#ai-augmentation
The pattern in which AI tools support a human worker's task without replacing the role.
Augmentation increases per-worker output without reducing headcount. Brookings 2024 finds most knowledge work is augmentation-prone at task level.
AI displacement#ai-displacement
An observed labour-market outcome in which AI deployment results in workforce reduction or role elimination.
Displacement is distinct from exposure. Exposure measures technical feasibility; displacement measures actual workforce change. The two have not moved in tandem in 2024-2025.

Source: New Data Show No AI Jobs Apocalypse (For Now) (2025)

AI exposure#ai-exposure
The share of tasks within an occupation that current AI can technically perform.
Exposure is a measure of feasibility, not prediction of displacement. ILO 2025 publishes exposure gradients per ISCO-08 occupation.

Source: Generative AI and Jobs: Refined Global Index of Occupational Exposure (2025 update) (2025)

AI-proof#ai-proof
Journalistic shorthand for occupations in the lowest AI-exposure gradient.
The calibrated phrase is lowest exposure gradient. AI-proof is not a guarantee of permanent insulation; the gradient is updated annually.
AORI (AI Occupational Risk Index)#aori
OECD-affiliated work measuring per-occupation exposure to AI. Used in conjunction with the ILO 2025 refined index.
AORI work covers both pre-LLM AI and generative AI. The ILO 2025 update is the most current per-occupation exposure measure derived from this stream.

Source: A Sectoral Taxonomy of AI Intensity (OECD AI Papers No. 30) (2024)

Augmentation-prone task#augmentation-prone
A task where AI accelerates the work but does not replace the worker performing it.
Brookings 2024 classifies many knowledge tasks as augmentation-prone, particularly those involving stakeholder context, judgement under uncertainty, or accountability.

Source: Generative AI, the American Worker, and the Future of Work (2024)

BLS Occupational Outlook Handbook#bls-ooh
The US Bureau of Labor Statistics' published outlook for hundreds of detailed occupations.
The Handbook accompanies the BLS Employment Projections release and provides per-occupation outlook narratives, projected growth, median wage, and entry requirements.

Source: Occupational Outlook Handbook (2025)

Brookings task-level rubric#brookings-task-rubric
The classification framework Brookings 2024 used to tag O*NET task statements by AI exposure.
The rubric distinguishes technical feasibility from contextual feasibility and underpins the calculator's Displaceable / Changing / Growing tags.

Source: Generative AI, the American Worker, and the Future of Work (2024)

Changing task#changing-task
A task that AI can technically perform in part, but where contextual constraints, accountability, or judgement keep the human in the loop.
Most knowledge-work tasks fall in this category per Brookings 2024.
Computerisation probability (Frey-Osborne)#computerisation-probability
Frey and Osborne's 2013 estimate of the probability that an occupation could be computerised within roughly two decades.
The estimates were derived pre-LLM using a Gaussian process classifier over 702 occupations. They do not capture cognitive-task disruption.

Source: The Future of Employment: How Susceptible Are Jobs to Computerisation? (2013)

Displaceable task#displaceable-task
A task that current AI can technically perform AND that an organisation can contextually delegate to AI.
Displaceable does not mean displaced. The label is about feasibility, not prediction. The calculator applies the Brookings 2024 rubric to identify these tasks.

Source: Generative AI, the American Worker, and the Future of Work (2024)

Eloundou et al. (GPTs are GPTs)#eloundou-gpts
A 2023 OpenAI-affiliated paper estimating LLM exposure for occupational tasks.
Cited on the sources page for completeness; not used as primary methodology because the analysis is from a frontier-AI vendor.

Source: GPTs are GPTs: An Early Look at the Labor Market Impact Potential of Large Language Models (2023)

Exposure gradient#exposure-gradient
The four-band classification (Low, Moderate, High, Very High) the ILO 2025 refined index assigns to each occupation.
The gradient is a band, not a continuous percentile. The calculator does not invent within-band precision.

Source: Generative AI and Jobs: Refined Global Index of Occupational Exposure (2025 update) (2025)

Frey-Osborne 2013#frey-osborne-2013
The 2013 Oxford Martin paper that estimated 47% of US employment was at high risk of computerisation.
The paper shaped the first generation of automation calculators. The 2024 unemployment rate did not reflect the projection. The methodology is excluded from this calculator.

Source: The Future of Employment: How Susceptible Are Jobs to Computerisation? (2013)

Generative AI#generative-ai
AI systems that generate text, image, audio, video, or code outputs from prompts. The 2022-2026 wave of large language models and image models is the operative scope.
ILO 2025 measures exposure specifically to generative AI, not to earlier waves of automation.
Growing skill#growing-skill
A skill the WEF Future of Jobs Report 2025 identifies as fastest-growing through 2030.
The top growing skills include AI and big data, networks and cybersecurity, technological literacy, creative thinking, resilience, curiosity, leadership, talent management, analytical thinking, and environmental stewardship.

Source: Future of Jobs Report 2025 (2025)

Growing task#growing-task
A task within an occupation that grows in importance as AI handles more of the discrete production work.
Examples: client briefing, stakeholder coordination, strategic judgement, exception handling, regulated decisions.

Source: Generative AI, the American Worker, and the Future of Work (2024)

ILO Generative AI Index#ilo-genai-index
The International Labour Organization's refined global index of occupational exposure to generative AI, latest 2025 update.
Assesses ISCO-08 6-digit occupations across approximately 30,000 tasks and assigns a four-band gradient.

Source: Generative AI and Jobs: Refined Global Index of Occupational Exposure (2025 update) (2025)

ISCO-08#isco-08
The International Standard Classification of Occupations, 2008 revision, maintained by the ILO.
ILO 2025 publishes exposure gradients at the ISCO-08 4-digit level. The calculator maps O*NET-SOC codes to ISCO-08 via the BLS-published crosswalk.
Knowledge work#knowledge-work
Work in which the primary output is information, analysis, advice, design, or decision support rather than physical product.
Knowledge work is the primary domain in which generative AI exposure is highest per ILO 2025.
McKinsey 2024 midpoint scenario#mck-midpoint
McKinsey's central estimate that 30% of current hours worked could be automated by 2030.
The estimate is aggregate, not per-occupation. The calculator references it for time-horizon framing only.

Source: A New Future of Work: The Race to Deploy AI and Raise Skills in Europe and Beyond (2024)

OECD/ILO refined index#oecd-ilo-refined-index
The combined OECD AI Working Group and ILO 2025 work measuring per-occupation generative-AI exposure.
The calculator uses ILO 2025 as primary source and OECD output as triangulation reference.

Source: Generative AI and Jobs: Refined Global Index of Occupational Exposure (2025 update) (2025)

O*NET#onet
The US Department of Labor's Occupational Information Network database of occupations, tasks, skills, and work activities.
Released under CC-BY 4.0. The current major release is O*NET 30.2.

Source: O*NET 30.2 Database (2025)

O*NET-SOC#onet-soc
The occupational classification system used by O*NET, an extension of the BLS Standard Occupational Classification (SOC).
O*NET-SOC codes map to BLS SOC codes for the BLS Employment Projections data and to ISCO-08 codes via the BLS crosswalk for ILO data.
Reverse skill bias#reverse-skill-bias
The 2023-2024 finding that generative AI exposure skews toward higher-educated knowledge workers, reversing the historical pattern of automation hitting lower-education workers harder.
Documented in the McKinsey 2023 generative-AI report on America.

Source: Generative AI and the Future of Work in America (2023)

Skills demand#skills-demand
The aggregate trajectory of skills employers expect to require in the next five years, as measured by WEF Future of Jobs surveys.
WEF 2025 surveys global employers on growing and declining skills, with the top-10 list updated annually.

Source: Future of Jobs Report 2025 (2025)

Task augmentation#task-augmentation
AI assistance that increases the speed or quality of a worker's task without replacing the worker.
Distinct from task displacement. Augmentation expands what each worker can do; displacement reduces the role.
Task displacement#task-displacement
AI substitution of a worker's task such that the task is no longer performed by a human.
Task displacement is observable but does not always lead to role displacement. Many roles continue with reduced task scope.
Task feasibility#task-feasibility
Whether AI can technically perform a task (technical feasibility) and whether an organisation can contextually delegate the task to AI (contextual feasibility).
Brookings 2024 distinguishes the two; both must be present for a task to be displaceable in practice.

Source: Generative AI, the American Worker, and the Future of Work (2024)

WEF Future of Jobs Report#wef-fojr
The World Economic Forum's annual report on the global jobs and skills outlook.
The 2025 edition projects 170 million new roles by 2030 against 92 million displaced for a net 78 million new roles.

Source: Future of Jobs Report 2025 (2025)